Magrios / Knowledge / Enterprise / How to run reference calls when buying software

How to run reference calls when buying software

Guide · Enterprise · 4 min read · last verified 2026-07-28

Reviewed before publication Editorial board Independent commercial review
In shortVendor-picked references come from the happy end of the customer distribution. A buyer's playbook for choosing who to talk to, asking questions that get past politeness, and weighing what you hear against firsthand evidence.

A reference call is a conversation with someone who already lives with the software you are considering — an existing customer, asked to describe what the product is like after the demos end. Run well, it is some of the cheapest diligence available in a purchase. Run the way many calls actually go — twenty polite minutes of "so, are you happy with it?" — it mostly confirms whatever you walked in believing.

One caveat frames everything else: the references a vendor hands you are drawn from the happy end of its customer distribution. That is not deception; it is selection doing what selection does, and no vendor volunteers the churned account. The seller's side of this dynamic — how reference calls quietly decide deals — is covered in reference calls decide deals you thought you already won. This piece is the buyer's playbook: choosing who you talk to, asking questions that get past politeness, and weighing what you hear.

Choose the reference before the questions

The person matters more than the question list. Ask the vendor for a customer that resembles you: similar size, a similar stack, an adjacent use case, and — importantly — tenure past the honeymoon. A customer a few weeks after go-live can describe the sales process; a customer approaching a second renewal can describe the product. Ask, politely, whether the vendor can connect you with an account that downgraded or left. Most will decline, and the manner of the declining is itself information. Then go beyond the list entirely: your own network, community forums, people who mention the product publicly. Off-list conversations carry no selection filter, and they run shorter, blunter, and more useful per minute than anything the vendor arranges.

Ask questions that outflank politeness

References want to be kind — to the vendor who asked the favor and to you, the stranger on the call. Direct questions about satisfaction invite ratings, and ratings flatten everything interesting. Ask for stories instead:

Each of these asks for a narrative rather than a verdict, and narratives tend to leak the specifics that verdicts conceal. The follow-up matters as much as the opener: when you hear a generality, ask for the example behind it.

Listen to the shape of the answer

Content is only part of what a reference call returns. Listen for form: pauses before praise; generalities where specifics ought to live; warmth about the vendor's people substituting for enthusiasm about the product; excitement about the roadmap standing in for satisfaction with the present. When someone says the team is wonderfully responsive, it is fair to ask what the team has been responding to. None of this is proof — it is signal to triangulate against other evidence. One practical note on candor: consider leaving recording tools off. In a period when AI note-takers join most meetings by default, saying explicitly that this call is just two people and handwritten notes can buy an honesty that no question list will.

Write it down before it fades

Capture verbatim phrases, not summaries. The difference between "support was fine" and "support was fine once we learned to escalate through our account manager" is the finding, and paraphrase destroys it. Put the notes into the same evaluation record as your hands-on results, so the calls are weighed alongside firsthand evidence rather than recalled later as a vague impression. A structured trial answers different questions than a reference call does — how to run a proof of concept with a market intelligence tool covers that side — and a good evaluation record shows both, plus a skeptical read of the vendor's own claims (how to read a vendor comparison page as a buyer).

Know what the call cannot carry

The limits are structural: a reference call is a small sample of someone else's context. Their team, their data, their expectations differ from yours in ways neither side fully sees. One glowing call proves little; so does one bitter one. What starts to mean something is repetition — the same theme surfacing across calls with customers in different situations. Treat references as one leg of diligence alongside the trial and the contract read, feeding the finance conversation that follows (what CFOs ask before approving new software), and the calls will earn their minutes. Treated as the deciding vote, they mostly return the answer the vendor arranged for you to hear.

Frequently asked questions

What should I ask on a vendor reference call?

Ask for stories rather than ratings: what surprised you after go-live, what would you do differently in the rollout, who stopped using it and why, what did you stop doing to make room for it, and what support was actually like the last time something broke. Narrative questions surface specifics that satisfaction questions flatten.

How do I get honest answers from references?

Choose references who resemble your company and are past the honeymoon period, seek off-list voices through your own network and communities, ask narrative questions rather than requesting scores, and consider keeping recorders and AI note-takers off the call — candor tends to rise when people are speaking to a person rather than to a transcript.

Are vendor-provided references useful?

Yes, within limits. They are drawn from the happiest customers, so treat them as the vendor's best case — useful for verifying implementation and support claims, insufficient as a picture of the typical experience. Balance them with off-list conversations and your own trial results.

How many reference calls are enough?

There is no fixed number. The useful signal is repetition: when the same themes appear across calls with customers in different contexts, they start to mean something. A single glowing or bitter call, in either direction, is a weak basis for a decision.

Further reading — chosen for this article
Entities in this research
Magriosreference callsvendor evaluationbuying processdue diligence
Related knowledge

Do AI vendors train on your data · shared entities

How to choose a market intelligence vendor · shared entities

A Competitor's Funding Announcement Tells You Less Than You Think · shared entities

What is a right-to-audit clause · same topic

Recently updated

Why marketing data flatters itself · 2026-07-29

What is cohort analysis in SaaS · 2026-07-29

Where to expand internationally first · 2026-07-29

What is a UTM parameter · 2026-07-29

Where does your brand stand?
Check your AI visibility free — real evidence, not a score.
Check my visibility or run the full analysis →